Since Boris Johnson stepped out to his podium for the first Coronavirus press conference, what seems like a lifetime ago, one phrase has come up more times than I can count: “following the science”.
As a member of the Scientists for Labour exec and a social sciences postgrad who gets giddy at the idea of evidence-based policy, you’d think this might have been something that pleased me; a politician following evidence as opposed to whim? Good grief! Yet in reality, all it does is irk me to the point that if I hear one more time I may just scream.
There are two key issues I take with this damned phrase: one (as has become apparent everytime we have failed to lockdown promptly and cases have soared) scientific evidence does not appear to a priority at all when it comes to policy making for this government, and two, it suggests that ‘science’ is a static, singular thing. Whilst I could spend hours ranting about the former (as my longsuffering friends and family can attest), it is the latter I wish to focus on here.
Science does not simply speak with one voice, and nor should it. It is continuously shifting as researchers make new discoveries, test hypotheses and interpret data in new and innovative ways. Sometimes, these voices contradict each other. Governmental responses across the world to the pandemic serve as evidence of this. Despite the fact that multiple nations have claimed to be “following the science”, they have still reached differing policy conclusions. From the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Swedish Public Health Agency, for example, opted for a herd immunity approach. They allowed community transmission to occur relatively unchecked, and no mandatory measures were taken to limit crowds on public transport, in shopping malls, or in other crowded places. Coronavirus testing, contact tracing, source identification, and reporting were also limited (Claeson & Hanson, 2020). This policy strategy was developed by scientists, and thus, by definition, based upon evidence. It is, however, in stark contrast to, the World Health Organisation (WHO) recommendations to limit social contact in order to prevent transmission, which are based upon their body of scientific evidence and which have been adopted by various other governments. Both approaches claim to be “following the science”, and that is not strictly untrue, just the science they have chosen to follow is different.
And it is not just the scientific voices that will differ and change which we must note, but also the fact that the way politicians and policy makers choose (consciously or not) to interpret the scientific evidence they are presented with will differ too. Whilst the evidence collated and presented by the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) has been the same for the devolved nations of the United Kingdom, the governments of the devolved nations have put different measures in place at different times. Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland all decided to enforce national lockdowns as of Boxing Day 2020, whilst England opted to continue with a tiered system until early January, for example. The political ideologies, priorities, contexts, and levels of understanding of the politicians presented with the ‘science’ in front of them will always have an impact on what they do with it.
The phrase has also allowed for the scientific community to become something of a scapegoat. When policy is unpopular, Johnson and co. can turn around, fling their arms up in the air and say ‘we’re just following the science!’. When policy goes wrong, they can do the same, and thus builds a general climate of distrust for science leading to harmful conspiracy theories and disengagement with our community in general. Mind you, after Michael Gove’s earlier comments that “people in this country have had enough of experts”, and presenting university academics as “‘enemies of promise” and “guilty men and women who have deprived a generation of the knowledge they need”, this should come of little surprise.
Science isn’t one static thing, but rather an ever-changing mass of conflicting perspectives. And so I leave with one last plea to politicians and policymakers in our party and beyond: yes- consult evidence, yes- work with the scientific leaders in the field so that policy responds to and actually listen to them, but (in the words of Ted Hastings) Jesus, Mary, Joseph and the wee donkey, move beyond this senseless, overly-simplistic soundbite.
Buyers who research and compare agents can find professionals willing to provide rebates, helping them secure the best deal. Understanding how rebates work and discussing them https://www.ezagents.com/ upfront with an agent ensures transparency and clarity in the home-buying process.
Some systems offer interactive voice response (IVR), voicemail detection, and call recording. Industries such as telemarketing, auto dialer software healthcare, and finance use auto dialers for customer outreach, reminders, and surveys. Cloud-based auto dialers provide remote accessibility and scalability. Features like real-time reporting and CRM integration help businesses track performance and optimize campaigns. To avoid fines, companies must follow regulations like the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and Do Not Call (DNC) lists.
Given higher priority to science than to soundbites keeps decisions rooted in facts, not in headline grabs. Sound logic and in-depth research are keys to knowing something complex. Informed information improves academic and work results. In case of rigorously researched scholarship, refer to Cheap Dissertation Writing Services for assured quality and validity.
Stable doors are also incredibly versatile and can be used in various parts of your home. While they are commonly installed as back doors or kitchen entrances, they also make excellent front doors, adding a welcoming and distinctive touch to your home’s facade. In addition, stable door can be used internally as room dividers, particularly in open-plan living spaces. They offer a flexible way to separate different areas while maintaining a sense of connectivity and openness. This versatility makes stable doors a popular choice among homeowners looking for functional and stylish solutions.
Gurgaon is home to several luxury hotels and banquet halls that provide excellent venues for birthday celebrations. Places like The Oberoi, birthday celebration places in gurgaon Trident, and Leela Ambience offer lavish banquet spaces with exceptional catering and décor services. These venues are perfect for milestone birthdays or upscale celebrations, ensuring an unforgettable experience with their world-class hospitality.